FootprintsintheWind.com

One question—How do we get to two becoming one? Under what conditions? Second question—What do we do once there? Together, we can ask ourselves.

:- Doug.

We are a cloud of unknowing.

:- Doug.

How close can we get to fusing? How close are we? Why do we fear it? Why are you even so fascinated? Do we wish to fuse with God? Then so too that of God in this one.

:- Doug.

Let us examine/examen the facts of us together—our nature, wishes, joys, fun, temperament, moods, constitution, yearnings, wishes, satisfactions and maybe we discover the way to make human nature good.

:- Doug.

We can train for our together by improv. Let’s search out good prompts.

:- Doug.

Just noticing some of my writing about Blake and Human, and wondering now if person may have some other rich aspect beyond where we have gone—foreground, heard, absorbed, real, like me, respected, worthy, valued. Does it have a face of fully developing, touching sacred, reaching for some as-yet unfound state of human? Then we no longer have nor need transcenders, but simply persons developing.

:- Doug.

We then are involved in a tapestry, the tapestry is conversation, the tapestry is at least mental and probably more. We are drawing forth the whole among persons, a tactual, color-filled, life-seeding work of living art.

:- Doug.

We need to be about drawing out, especially the sacred. But it need not be as high as a deity, nor as low as the simply excellent or self-actualized person. It is the healthy person, healthy in body, mind, spirit. There seems to be no word, so maybe we need to make up one.

:- Doug.

Play with the difficult and serious.

:- Doug.

What’s your project?

:- Doug.

Counter-intuitively we must be less aware of our other person.

:- Doug.

Move from heuristics to greater certainty of what is good.

:- Doug.

Let us ask our together, what here is good?

:- Doug.

We are not going to be a two-headed monster—just a step more fully human.

:- Doug.

Most of all Maslow asked, What’s possible?

:- Doug.

We become an active part of the world we wish to observe, the one we wish also to mold. That is a way of saying, we recognize, we let in, we accept a level of responsibility.

:- Doug.

You and I are isomorphic and might become integral not just with one another but to.

:- Doug.

Full humanness must include the more than me.

:- Doug.

He’s stuck in his own poo.

:- Doug.

When you enter life’s garden thro’ the conversation doorway. . . of necessity you go hand in hand—which means you can ill manipulate the world—but can grasp bigger bunches of it—just like plants cannot and can—and do.

:- Doug.

How can you be more you-ish, and I more Doug-ish? Then drop the prefix to simply be ish?

:- Doug.

To face transcendence of two is to look into the face of the unknown—and have it look into yours.

:- Doug.

Actors in theater or improv can enter this zone—becoming the scene, and the scene comes alive.

:- Doug.