For the rest of us
Self-actualizing people have gotten there, and still are motivated. In this they point out further for the rest of us.
:- Doug.
Self-actualizing people have gotten there, and still are motivated. In this they point out further for the rest of us.
:- Doug.
To what higher stand can we stretch without flinching or retreating? Our task is to invent it.
:- Doug.
Can we allow our two become as one self to live the questions (as in Rilke Letters to A Young Poet), that is, to meet and live life?
:- Doug.
How confused can we permit ourselves to become—how close to losing our bearings? How dangerous do we find that to be?
:- Doug.
How honest can we be with each other? Answer on a ten point scale. How soon? What are the dangers and rewards?
:- Doug.
Can we talk about religion and spirituality? Why would we? What are the limits? What do we need to talk about? Do we talk about values? Can we become conscious of the roles and needs we have for these?
:- Doug.
Why do we call it Artificial Intelligence? Do we consider intelligence our highest value?
:- Doug.
It’s a trick to perceive the time-bound and the eternal now simultaneously—a trick we can learn, we can teach one another.
:- Doug.
We can here invent—find and create, both—a new higher model for the human, which is to say, conversation.
:- Doug.
This is like Maslow’s new humanistic psychology, and can be our new humanistic conversation.
:- Doug.
Conversation can have a purpose—and that to make a better society, and especially to grow better persons. We can share that purpose, generate it together, take steps toward it.
:- Doug.
Another condition for transcendence by two at once (and a way of that transcendence) is to find the goods of sameness thro’ this friend: playfulness; poetic feeling; artful understanding; creativity.
:- Doug.
Conditions for transcendence—Willingness to give up ego shields; willingness to fully expose oneself to oneself.
:- Doug.
Together gives us a larger, more inclusive field to explore, and therefore truer, for the more facts we have the better should be our decisions and actions.
:- Doug.
Perhaps we are too enculturated and habituated to individual thinking. Perhaps we can never come around to it. Or maybe just for a second or two once in our lifetime. But if once it happens then it was worth all the effort it took to not think of self first and only. So maybe someone else gets there twice. It is enough to suggest a try for three.
:- Doug.