Why choose names?
I’m on to something. Why do I insist on giving it names of my choosing?
:- Doug.
Maybe the next station will be an easy relationship—“Hi, old friend. Sit a spell.”
:- Doug.
We are integral
to all there is
doing fascinating
being fun
functionable artfully
processual
meaning-fully
:- Doug.
It’s not about learning something one or both of us can use; it is about being together.
:- Doug.
Poetry is elusive, a pick axe. Are those two different metaphors? One is mitten, the other glove.
:- Doug.
Harmony may be the result and gift of gathering, but probably cannot be sought.
:- Doug.
It is not the sense of the Meeting about anything, even a decision, but the sense as the home.
:- Doug.
Magnetic field S-S, N-N between persons, the more alike the stronger the pushing against, and thereby the field grows.
:- Doug.
Intersubjectivity is a condition for gathering, a base, a vase.
:- Doug.
My other “faces” me with more than his or her face: with his or her life. Here and now shows up body and essence, full attention, leaning in.
:- Doug.
If/Since a dyad is an intersubjective woven out of conversations, we do well to investigate, and imaginatively at that, the weaving going on, previously occurring, and coming-on between these two.
:- Doug.
Some researchers stop at discovering misunderstandings or agreement. Harvesters wait and go into the fields and orchards when fruit is fit and ready.
:- Doug.
There is value in researching our own imaginations; we never suspected.
:- Doug.
We think, apparently only, by means of holding one thing next to another: you to me; a measuring tape to a board; a robin to an eagle. Call these by their true names: relations; comparisons; teachers.
:- Doug.
How is one to seek out elders when one is of such years? Ahh, but elders are not of years made. Ahh, but there is elder stuff in us.
:- Doug.