We talk in incomplete
In conversation we talk in incomplete
ideas collide
others get it still
repetitious
meaning otherwise
saying same
differently heard
:- Doug.
In conversation we talk in incomplete
ideas collide
others get it still
repetitious
meaning otherwise
saying same
differently heard
:- Doug.
How can we not prepare for conversation? We can gather our thoughts and information about the players, context, text, and subtext. We can think of the complexities of all these. Then throw away our notes, clear our minds. How can we not prepare for what we don’t see coming, for the things we don’t know we don’t know? In the midst of the conversation how can we unprepare the players for this conversation?
:- Doug.
Conversation is the constant unveiling of reality. Therefore, we cannot know, much less direct, outcomes. Conversation by nature seeks surprise.
:- Doug.
What does it mean for a conversation that it’s never that and nothing more?
:- Doug.
How might we continue a conversation? Is conversation ever over? How might we make sure it is never over?
:- Doug.
Footprints in the Windsm # 2114
Energy is found in all parts of the context: the players, the surround, the betweens, and it is this energy, this push, that makes systems complex and adaptive. It is the dog-kick principle in action: kick a stone and you can from physics know what it will do; kick a dog and the dog has input into what happens next. The dog has stored up calories and experiences which have a greater role than your kick. Only in real life there are more dogs than we can count. A few of these “extra” dogs bite.
Please pass it on.
© c 2022, Learning Works, Incorporated. All rights reserved. Easy reprint permissions: 574/291-0022, or by e-mail to mailto:Footprints AT FootprintsInTheWind.com. Back issues available at http://www.FootprintsintheWind.com
Please publish in your print or electronic periodical, with the above info.
To subscribe, send an e-mail with the word “subscribe” to mailto:Footprints AT FootprintsInTheWind.com
Conversation exists, it is true, in time; it is hard to be heard if all speak at once. Conversation is also in space, in the bodies and heads and smiles and shouts of the players. Conversation is in the flows and emergences to and from the betweens and surround, the texts and contexts and subtexts. Conversation is in the also—the somethings more. So physical descriptors fit, but must be elastic, and must leave passages for more. It is the function which matters, not perfection.
:- Doug.
Thinking is strenuous work; we avoid it at all costs, including progress. We jump across to used thinking—called thoughts—ours and others’, because those fly easier and faster. The value of conversation is to stimulate new thinking work but it is mainly co-opted by thoughts, so we get mired without realizing. We’re excited by a “new” idea but just that fast it becomes a “used” thought. If it’s a thought, it’s used. We have to slog on.
:- Doug.
Just as thin-slicing strawberries puts us in touch with more sweetness and flavor, by being in touch with more of the betweens and players of a conversation we may find more life. When you slice a conversation what do you get to taste?
:- Doug.
It may be that the human animal is a good detector instrument for what has deep feeling in a conversation, for what touches spirit (as it is for BS). So others in a conversation likely feel what you do. Notice that people are excited and bored, by turns—but often together—in a group event. If true we can use this ability to observe conversations for what works.
:- Doug.
In conversation, as in dreams, see yourself as each of the characters.
:- Doug.
So how is conversation a built thing, a thing being constructed, a beautiful thing found in the wood or streams? It takes work, strength, stretching. Its beauty is often found in rustic, unfinished places, a chance expression in a clumsy speaking out. It is learned, it is found, it is made of things supporting the beauty and function of one another.
:- Doug.
This balloon is where we live our days
With what we feel and love and fight and know
Enshrouded in our guesses thick as haze
At that edge! We touch our ignorance
Dare we poke our finger through—and grow?
:- Doug.
Footprints in the Windsm # 2113
The role of each participant is to complicate.
Please pass it on.
© c 2022, Learning Works, Incorporated. All rights reserved. Easy reprint permissions: 574/291-0022, or by e-mail to mailto:Footprints AT FootprintsInTheWind.com. Back issues available at http://www.FootprintsintheWind.com
Please publish in your print or electronic periodical, with the above info.
To subscribe, send an e-mail with the word “subscribe” to mailto:Footprints AT FootprintsInTheWind.com
Freire is objectifying reality, pitting it over against us, showing it as a problem to be worked, with the purpose of transforming that reality. When we see we are oppressed by our own less than conscious ways of accepting our stunted humanity, in that act of seeing we have initiated our transformation. But it is a seed with only a first watering.
:- Doug.
If the oppressor is the oppressed, not only lives inside but is engendered by her or him, such as our present early 21st century consumer culture, how do we cast off the oppressor (ourselves), engage in a pedagogy of ourselves? We cannot know ahead of time. We can only work toward birthing authentic and free persons. That work? Dialogue. This is the problem our conversing works on—becoming human.
:- Doug.
I like a large room with conversations in the corners and odd spaces of it, where we can all see and hear the buzz and receive the energy of the other players, and still concentrate on this particular conversation, this player speaking to me, to us. The focus—the fireplace—is the center circle which existed, has dispersed, and will gather again from the fires sparking in each corner and odd space. Focus produces something.
:- Doug.